November 2011 Archives

November 25, 2011

Interlock Devices in connection with an Illinois DUI

Mothers Against Drunk Drivers (MADD) is convinced that the answer to DUI (Driving Under the Influence) is to require anyone convicted of DUI to install an ignition interlock device. In Illinois, this is known as a Breath Alcohol Ignition Interlock Device (BAIID)

A machine designed to measure the alcohol content of your breath is wired into your vehicle's ignition. The device has a mouthpiece attached to it. You must blow into the mouthpiece and not register above a certain alcohol level in order for your vehicle to start. The results of all breath samples are stored and provided to the Illinois Secretary of State. 92 Ill. Adm. Code ยง1001.441

MADD, along with the manufacturers and installers of the BAIID machines, relentlessly promote the use of this device. After all, if the DUI "crisis" were ever alleviated, neither organization would have a reason to exist.

These organizations use their lobbying and campaign contributions at both the federal and state level. Their latest target is Massachusetts. They are promoting that first time DUI offenders be required to use an interlock device. It is a safe bet that at some point, they will set their sites on Illinois.

The law in Illinois with relation to when BAIID is required is more than a little confusing for someone who does not specialize in DUI. There exist two separate situations in which BAIID is required and within each of those situations, there are exceptions to the requirement.

To understand the differences, you must keep in mind that there are two prongs to a DUI arrest. At the time of a DUI arrest, the police will ask you to submit to a blood or breath test to determine what your blood alcohol content is. 625 ILCS 5/11-501.1

If you choose to submit to testing and register a level of .08 or greater, those results can be used against you in the DUI prosecution, as operating a motor vehicle with a BAC above .08 is illegal, or in other words, a crime. 625 ILCS 5/11-501 Even if you elect not to submit to testing, the state can charge you with driving while impaired by alcohol, or in other words, straight DUI.

Upon being convicted of a DUI, you face criminal consequences, (jail and or fines). For purposes of BAIID issues, the more important consequence of a DUI conviction is a driver's license revocation.

Once your driver's license is revoked because you were convicted of DUI, you must have a hearing with the Illinois Secretary of State. 625 ILCS 5/6-208 As Illinois law presently stands, you are not required to have BAIID in the event you are issued a restricted driving permit (RDP) or full reinstatement if this is your only DUI disposition in this or any other state. 625 ILCS 5/6-205(c) and 6-206(c)3

Furthermore, if you have had a previous DUI arrest and avoided being convicted of the DUI and your statutory summary suspension from the earlier arrest was rescinded, you are not BAIID required. And if you were not convicted of a prior DUI and received an SSS but the previous SSS was more than 10 years ago, you are not BAIID.

Continue reading "Interlock Devices in connection with an Illinois DUI " »

November 18, 2011

Madison County DUI fatality results in guilty plea

On October 22, 2010, Brittney Rhea Butler was driving on Route 143 in Madison County, Illinois. The motor vehicle she was operating slammed into the rear of a vehicle that was stopped on the highway waiting to make a left turn.

In Butler's 1985 Cadillac was a 35 year-old passenger, Jeffrey L. Davis of Edwardsville, Illiinois. While Butler suffered only minor injuries, Davis died.

There were no skid marks; police estimated the Butler vehicle was traveling 80 MPH. Butler's blood alcohol level was .162. She was charged with aggravated Driving Under the Influence (DUI).

The legal limit for an Illinois DUI is .08. 625 ILCS 5/11-501.2 The possible penalties and driver's license sanctions for a first time DUI are up to 364 days in the county jail and/or a fine of up to $2,500.00 and a one year driver's license revocation. 625 ILCS 5/11-501; 730 ILCS 5/5-4.5-55; 625 ILCS 5/6-208(b)(1)

Illinois has a DUI disposition known as court supervision. If a person is eligible for court supervision and if the judge sees fit to grant supervision, jail time cannot be imposed. In addition, since supervision is not a conviction, there will not be a driver's license revocation. 730 ILCS 5/5-6-1. (d)

However, Butler was charged with aggravated DUI and supervision was not an option. The DUI is considered "aggravated" because of the fatality. 625 ILCS 5/11-501(d)(1)(F)

As a result of the aggravated nature of the offense, not only was supervision not an option, but since aggravated DUI is a felony, Butler faced from 3 to 14 years in the Illinois Department of Corrections (prison). Butler agreed to plead guilty.

In exchange for her guilty plea, prosecutors agreed to seek no more than 10 years in prison. The final sentence will be up to the judge.

In the opinion of this DUI lawyer, Butler is likely to receive 10 years. In determining an appropriate sentence, the judge is entitled to look at Butler's criminal past.

At the time Butler committed this offense, she was on probation for two felony drug convictions from only year earlier. She also had a 2007 DUI arrest that was pled down to reckless driving.

Continue reading "Madison County DUI fatality results in guilty plea" »

November 11, 2011

Heavy-handed DUI tactics leave Kane County authorities red-faced

In Illinois, there are several consequences that flow from an arrest for Driving Under the Influence (DUI). The DUI statute, found at 625 ILCS 5/11-501, states, in part, that "(a) A person shall not drive or be in actual physical control of any vehicle within this State while:
(1) the alcohol concentration in the person's blood or breath is 0.08 or more based on the definition of blood and breath units in Section 11-501.2;
(2) under the influence of alcohol";

Therefore, you may be charged with DUI based upon the fact your blood alcohol level (BAL) was .08 or higher. The state is not required to prove that you seemed drunk (staggering, bloodshot eyes, etc).

Quite simply, it is illegal in Illinois to drive with more than .08% alcohol in your system. It is similar to speeding. The police do not have to show that your high speed made you a dangerous driver but simply that you were driving above the posted limit.

You may be tempted to conclude, if I never take the test, they cannot prove what my BAL was and therefore cannot convict me of driving with a BAL above .08. That strategy does carry with it some risks.

Refusing the test prevents the .08 prosecution, but it allows the state to argue you had a "guilty mind". In other words, if you had nothing to hide, why didn't you take the test? This could help the state convict you under the second definition of DUI, (part 2 above, "under the influence of alcohol").

DUI under this section requires the state to prove that you were in fact impaired, since your refusal to submit to testing may be considered by the jury as evidence of a guilty mind 625 ILCS 6/11-501.2; P. v. Rolfingsmeyer, 101 Ill. 2d 137, 77 Ill. Dec. 787 (1984). By not submitting to testing, you forfeit the opportunity to show you were under the legal limit and you provide the state with an argument to use against you at trial.

Refusal of the test also carries with it driver's license consequences in terms of the statutory summary suspension (SSS). The SSS law is found at 625 ILCS 5/11-501.1 and 625 ILCS 5/6-208 and 208.1

Continue reading "Heavy-handed DUI tactics leave Kane County authorities red-faced" »

November 4, 2011

Football player receives supervision in Champaign County DUI

The University of Illinois is the flagship university in Illinois. The main campus is located in the twin cities of Urbana-Champaign, Champaign County. There are branch campuses in other cities, including Springfield, Illinois.

As a Big Ten university, the U of I has a football program. Being a university, it has young people. Young people drink, some of them drive. And some of them are charged with Driving Under the Influence (DUI).

On July 30, 2011, one Ashante Williams, a U of I football player, was arrested for DUI in Urbana. It was reported that Williams was stopped at about 1:30 AM for improper lane usage and speeding. Williams did submit to a breath test, with a resulting blood alcohol level of .177. The legal blood alcohol level in Illinois is .08. 625 ILCS 5/11-501(a)(1).

When a person who is arrested for DUI registers a blood alcohol level of .08 or higher, he has committed a "per se" violation of the DUI laws. This is a Latin term that essential translates into "automatic".

The state does not have to prove that the driver was under the influence of alcohol ("drunk") but simply that he was operating a motor vehicle with a blood alcohol content of .08 or higher. The Illinois Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of the "per se" law. People v. Ziltz 98 Ill.2d 38, 455 N.E.2d 70 (1983)

Williams was granted court supervision for one year. Supervision is a sentence that prevents Williams from having his driver's license revoked by the Secretary of State, the agency in Illinois that maintains driving records.

The judge imposed certain conditions on Williams (fines, alcohol classes, Victim Impact Panel sponsored by MADD), including that he not receive another traffic violation during the year his supervision is in effect. If Williams complies with all of the supervision requirements, although he pled guilty to DUI, he will not have a conviction entered on his record and the charges will be dismissed. 730 ILCS 5/5-6-3.1(e)

Continue reading "Football player receives supervision in Champaign County DUI" »